Outcome. The court found that: "Texas has discriminated against petitioner by denying him a reasonable opportunity to pursue his Buddhist faith comparable to that offered other prisoners adhering to conventional religious precepts..."
People also ask
What was the decision in Cruz v. Beto?
What did Cruz v Beto decided in 1972 hold that inmates must be given?
Why is Cruz v Beto important?
Held: On the basis of the allegations, Texas has discriminated against petitioner by denying him a reasonable opportunity to pursue his Buddhist faith ...
Jan 1, 2009 · The Supreme Court ruled in Cruz's favor when they said a trial court could not dismiss his claims without a finding a fact. (Prison mug shot of ...
Apr 18, 2024 · Cruz wrote his complaint on toilet paper. He asked the district court for declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages, complaining ...
Plaintiff has failed to show what privileges Buddhists are denied that are extended to other religious groups. Finally, plaintiff has failed to show prison ...
Missing: ruling | Show results with:ruling
Lower court. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Citation. 405 US 319 (1972). Decided. Mar 20, 1972. Sort: by seniority; by ideology.
Nov 7, 1979 · The evidence in this case conclusively demonstrates that defendant Beto's actions were not reasonable under the circumstances and were not taken ...
Nov 6, 2018 · Ted Cruz, R-Texas, narrowly defeated Democratic challenger Beto O'Rourke Tuesday evening in what appeared likely to be one of the closest U.S ...
Missing: ruling | Show results with:ruling
Feb 15, 2023 · Q1. The Supreme Court ruled in Cruz v. Beto that the Texas statute excluding felons from voting violated the Equal Protection Clause of the ...
He alleges that, for violating this regulation, he has been placed in solitary confinement, deprived of good time credits, demoted to third class inmate status, ...